Fiscal Conservatives have a new sports hero to root for. On Sunday, golfer Phil Mickelson made cyrptic statements
following his final round at the Humana Challenge in Conjunction With
the William J Clinton Foundation (how fitting is that?) about having to
make "drastic changes in his life" to deal with higher taxes. Phil
lives in California--which has followed the Federal Government's lead in
increasing taxes on the rich to deal with crippling budget deficits
driven by the expansion of the entitlement system. By Phil's estimate
he will now pay between 62 and 63-percent of his annual income in
Federal, State and FICA taxes.
Keep in mind, as independent contractors, pro golfers are responsible for paying 100-percent of their
Social
Security and Medicare taxes. They also buy their own health
insurance--and I'm guessing with the potential for surgeries and rehab
caused by repetitive motion injuries--their plans fall under the
"Cadillac Plan Tax" included in the Affordable Care Act. And their
income levels--especially Phil's--are subject to the ObamaCare surcharge
tax on the rich as well.
Phil wouldn't get into
specifics about what the "drastic changes" might be. It could be as
simple as not playing as many tournaments in California (where all those
making the cut in a tournament pay state taxes on their winnings. That
explains why there are so many tourneys in Texas, Arizona and Florida
every year--no state income taxes). Or Phil may choose to move his
family from their home outside San Diego to one of the other tax haven
states I mentioned before--which is where the vast majority of pro
golfers have chosen to live. But what many in the media are guessing is
that Phil may choose to just hang up the clubs and walk away from
full-time Tour membership.
The guess comes from the
fact that Phil's statement came during a discussion of Steve Stricker's
semi-retirement this year. That's when Phil launched into his
dissertation on taxes and how he is one of the President Obama's
"targets". He also pointed out that he would be able to cut those tax
rates by simply living off of his investments--which would be taxed at
the lower capital gains rate (or "Mitt Romney rate" as it will likely be
known for the next decade or so).
With an income of more than 100-million dollars last year--according to estimates by Golf Digest--Phil
Mickelson and his family will still do okay whether he continues to
golf for a living or retires. But the millions that he and his wife
donate to charities every year like their foundation--which provides
grants to science and math teachers around the country and to disabled
veterans programs--or the dozens of other non-profits that benefit from
anonymous gifts, likely won't be provided any more. And that just means
more taxes so the Government can pay for those things instead.
Maybe Phil just finished reading Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged
and realized that his "fair share" is a little beyond "fair"--and that
he would be better off joining the "non-working class". I just find it
ironic on this Inauguration Day that President Obama has not only made
it more lucrative for the unemployed to stay out of work--but also for
the rich to no longer work as well. Perhaps he really is the "Messiah"
the Left believes him to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment